翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Aboriginal Shire of Doomadgee ・ Aboriginal Shire of Hope Vale ・ Aboriginal Shire of Kowanyama ・ Aboriginal Shire of Palm Island ・ Aboriginal Shire of Pormpuraaw ・ Aboriginal Shire of Yarrabah ・ Aboriginal sites of New South Wales ・ Aboriginal sites of Victoria ・ Aboriginal stone arrangement ・ Aboriginal Tasmanians ・ Aboriginal Tent Embassy ・ Aboriginal title ・ Aboriginal title in California ・ Aboriginal title in Louisiana ・ Aboriginal title in New Mexico ・ Aboriginal title in New York ・ Aboriginal title in the Marshall Court ・ Aboriginal title in the Taney Court ・ Aboriginal title in the United States ・ Aboriginal title statutes in the Thirteen Colonies ・ Aboriginal tracker ・ Aboriginal whaling ・ Aboriginal-based organized crime ・ Aboriginals Protection and Restriction of the Sale of Opium Act 1897 ・ Aborigine ・ Aboriginella ・ Aborigines (mythology) ・ Aborigines Advancement League ・ Aborigines in White Australia ・ Aborigines Museum Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Aboriginal title in New York ： ウィキペディア英語版 Aboriginal title in New York Aboriginal title in New York has been the source of many disputes regarding the status of aboriginal title in the United States. The European purchase of lands from indigenous populations dates back to the legendary Dutch purchase of Manhattan in 1626, "the most famous land transaction of all."〔Banner, 2005, at 75.〕 More than any other state, New York disregarded the Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783 and the Nonintercourse Acts of 1790, 1793, 1796, 1799, 1802, and 1834, purchasing the majority of the state directly from the Iroquois nations without federal involvement or ratification.〔Gunther, 1958, at 3--7.〕 New York is the source of several landmark decisions concerning aboriginal title including ''Oneida I'' (1974), "first of the modern-day (American land ) claim cases to be filed in federal court,"〔Vecsey & Starna, 1988, at 144.〕 and ''Oneida II'' (1985), "the first Indian land claim case won on the basis of the Nonintercourse Act."〔Vecsey & Starna, 1988, at 145.〕 New York was the site of nearly all remaining Native American possessory land claims when the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in ''Cayuga Indian Nation of N.Y. v. Pataki'' (2005) that the equitable doctrine of ''laches'' bars all tribal land claims sounding in ejectment or trespass, for both tribal plaintiffs and the federal government as plaintiff-intervenor.〔Kathryn E. Fort, The New Laches: Creating Title where None Existed, 16 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 357 (2009); Patrick W. Wandres, Indian Land Claims, ''Sherrill'' and the Impending Legacy of the Doctrine of Laches, 31 Am. Indian L. Rev. 131 (2006).〕 Since the ruling, no tribal plaintiff has overcome the ''laches'' defense in a land claim in the Second Circuit.〔''Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. v. County of Oneida'', 617 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2010); ''Onondaga Nation v. New York'', 2010 WL 3806492 (N.D.N.Y. 2010); ''Shinnecock Indian Nation v. New York'', 2006 WL 3501099 (E.D.N.Y. 2006).〕 There are currently 10 Indian reservations in New York: Allegany Indian Reservation, Cattaraugus Reservation, Oil Springs Reservation, Oneida Reservation, Onondaga Reservation, Poospatuck Reservation, St. Regis Mohawk Reservation, Shinnecock Reservation, Tonawanda Reservation, and Tuscarora Reservation. ==History== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Aboriginal title in New York」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.